Document Type: Letter to Editor

Authors

1 School of Medicine, University “G.d’Annunzio” Chieti – Pescara, via dei Vestini n. 100, 66100 Chieti, Italy

2 Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Chieti, via dei Vestini n. 1, 66100 Chieti, Italy

Abstract

Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is one of the most frequently encountered disorders in Emergency Surgery Departments worldwide without negligible hospital admission rates and social costs (1,2). Notwithstanding significant improvements in techniques and materials, intra-abdominal adhesions following abdominal surgery still represent a major unsolved and debated issue harbouring challenges regarding diagnosis, pathogenesis, management and  revention. In this setting, the cornerstone lies on a proper nosological classification with a subsequent diagnostic dilemma in distinguishing ASBO from other causes of obstruction and in an early identification of emergency surgery cases.
conflicting results raise more questions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

1. ten Broek RPG, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJP, Bouvy ND, Kruitwagen RFPM, Jeekel J, et al. Burden of adhesions in
abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and metanalysis. BMJ 2013; 347: f5588. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5588.
2. Loftus T, Moore F, VanZant E, Bala T, Brakenridge S, Croft C, et al. A protocol for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015; 78(1):13-9; discussion 9-21. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000000491.
3. Parker MC, Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Wilson MS, Menzies D, et al. Postoperative adhesions: ten-year followup of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44(6): 822-29; discussion 9-30.
4. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions
after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999; 353(9163): 1476-80. doi: 10.1016/
s0140-6736(98)09337-4.
5. ten Broek RP, Strik C, Issa Y, Bleichrodt RP, van GoorH. Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 2013; 258(1): 98-106. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826f4969.
6. Catena F, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S, Pinna AD. P.O.P.A. study: prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by
icodextrin 4% solution after laparotomy for adhesive small bowel obstruction. A prospective randomized controlled
trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16(2): 382-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1736-y.
7. Ten Broek RPG, Stommel MWJ, Strik C, van Laarhoven CJHM, Keus F, van Goor H. Benefits and harms of adhesion
barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2014; 383(9911): 48-59. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61687-6.
8. Nakamura T, Sato T, Naito M, Ogura N, Yamanashi T, Miura H, et al. Laparoscopic Surgery is Useful for Preventing
Recurrence of Small Bowel Obstruction After Surgery for Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction. Surg Laparosc
Endosc Percutan Tech 2016; 26(1): e1-4. doi: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000238.
9. Aquina CT, Probst CP, Becerra AZ, Iannuzzi JC, Hensley BJ, Noyes K, et al. Missed Opportunity: Laparoscopic
Colorectal Resection Is Associated With Lower Incidence of Small Bowel Obstruction Compared to an Open Approach. Ann Surg 2016; 264(1): 127-34. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001389.
10. Sakari T, Sjodahl R, Pahlman L, Karlbom U. Role of icodextrin in the prevention of small bowel obstruction.
Safety randomized patients control of the first 300 in the ADEPT trial. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18(3): 295-300. doi:10.1111/codi.13095.
11. Ahmad G, Mackie FL, Iles DA, O’Flynn H, Dias S, Metwally M, et al. Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (7): Cd001298. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001298.pub4.