Document Type : short communication


1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Imam Hosein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Emergency Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


Objective: Each imaging technique has a special application and usage, and should be used in the right situation. Physicians choose the type of imaging technique by considering the type of tissue and the benefits and disadvantages of the imaging method as well as its financial burden on the patient. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost of imaging tests performed in the emergency department (ED) of an educational hospital and determine their financial burden on both the patients and the healthcare system of the country. Methods: This retrospective descriptive cross-sectional single-center study was conducted in Shohadaye Tajrish, an educational hospital, during one year. The study population consisted of all patients who had undergone some type of imaging (CT scan, ultrasound, radiography, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) in the ED. The information was collected using a predesigned checklist. The costs of a variety of imaging methods for patients referred to the ED were calculated using different types of accounting units and PACS system. Results: The number of patients who visited the ED of the studied hospital during a one year period was 63507. The total cost of performing different types of imaging methods in the studied center throughout the one-year target period was 44018695695 Rials (≃$US 423745) (59.27% of which was spent on CT scan, 16.09% on ultrasound, 13.75% on plain radiography and 10.87% on MRI). Conclusion: According to the collected data, the total cost of radiology was 44018695695 Rials. The highest cost was related to CT scan modality, and the lowest belonged to MRI.


Main Subjects

1. Al-Malki MA, Abulfaraj WH, Bhuiyan SI, Kinsara AA. A study on radiographic repeat rate data of several hospitals in Jeddah. Radiat Prot Dosimetry2003; 103(4): 323-30. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals. rpd.a006149.
2. Mills AM, Raja AS, Marin JR. Optimizing diagnostic imaging in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22(5): 625-31. doi: 10.1111/acem.12640.
3. Baratloo A, Talebian MT, Mirbaha S, Bagheri-Hariri S. Reducing Unnecessary CT Scanning in Head Trauma of Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review. J Pediatr Rev 2019; 7(2): 99-104. doi: 10.32598/jpr.7.2.99.
4. Li Z, Zhang X, Müller H, Zhang S. Large-scale retrieval for medical image analytics: A comprehensive review. Med Image Anal 2018; 43: 66-84. doi: 10.1016/j. media.2017.09.007.
5. Lacy NL, Paulman A, Reuter MD, Lovejoy B. Why we don’t come: patient perceptions on no-shows. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2(6): 541-5. doi: 10.1370/afm.123.
6. Raja AS, Ip IK, Sodickson AD, Walls RM, Seltzer SE, Kosowsky JM, et al. Radiology utilization in the emergency department: trends of the past 2 decades. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203(2): 355-60. doi: 10.2214/ajr.13.11892.
7. Ronkainen J. Costs in today’s radiology: aBC analysis of typical situations in the transitional period. University of Oulu; 2007.
8. Rhea JT. Reducing hospital emergency department costs through aggressive use of diagnostic imaging. Emerg Radiol 1998; 5(3): 129-34. doi: 10.1007/ bf02749096.
9. Hess EP, Haas LR, Shah ND, Stroebel RJ, Denham CR, Swensen SJ. Trends in computed tomography utilization rates: a longitudinal practice-based study. J Patient Saf 2014; 10(1): 52-8. doi: 10.1097/ PTS.0b013e3182948b1a.
10. Oh HY, Kim EY, Kim JE, Kim YJ, Choi HY, Cho J, et al. Trends of CT use in the pediatric emergency department in a tertiary academic hospital of Korea during 2001-2010. Korean J Radiol 2012; 13(6): 771- 5. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.6.771.
11. Quaday KA, Salzman JG, Gordon BD. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography utilization trends in an academic ED. Am J Emerg Med 2014; 32(6): 524-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.01.054.