Document Type : Letter to Editor
Authors
1 Education Development Center, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3 Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Abstract
A significant portion of medical students learning is dedicated to clinical education, especially in the field of Emergency Medicine (EM). Clinical rotations in the Emergency Department (ED) are of utmost importance, given the vital role emergency medicine plays within the healthcare system. Emergency departments represent the forefront of medical care, frequently addressing life-threatening circumstances that necessitate swift decision-making, advanced clinical expertise, and the capacity to operate effectively under pressure. Familiarizing medical students with this high-stakes environment provides them with critical competencies, including acute care management, collaborative teamwork, and proficient communication skills, all of which are relevant across various medical disciplines. In this regard, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine outlines a four-year curriculum for emergency medicine training. First-year students learn basic first aid, CPR, and the local EMS system. Second-year students apply pathophysiology to acute presentations and practice diagnosis skills. Third-year students refine history-taking and examination techniques, working with residents in lower-acuity areas and beginning differential diagnoses. Throughout, students focus on professionalism, communication, and teamwork, preparing them for future roles in emergency medicine.
Keywords
Main Subjects
2. Alorayf AE, Alsaleh AA, Alrubaie BM, Al Jamish YA, Alyami AS, Al Aldbey HH, et al. Innovation in crisis: how emergency
medicine is reshaping nursing roles. J Surv Fish Sci. 2023;10(5):62-8. doi: 10.53555/sfs.v10i5.2199.
3. Johnson GA, Pipas L, Newman-Palmer NB, Brown LH. The emergency medicine rotation: a unique experience for
medical students. J Emerg Med. 2002;22(3):307-11. doi:10.1016/s0736-4679(01)00497-8.
4. DeBehnke DJ, Restifo KM, Mahoney JF, Coates WC. Undergraduate curriculum. SAEM Undergraduate Education
Committee, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(11):1110-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-
2712.1998.tb02672.x.
5. Celenza A, Rogers IR. Qualitative evaluation of a formal bedside clinical teaching programme in an emergency
department. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(10):769-73. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.037796.
6. Beigzadeh A, Adibi P, Bahaadinbeigy K, Yamani N. Strategies for teaching in clinical rounds: a systematic review of the
literature. J Res Med Sci. 2019;24:33. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_460_18.
7. Gonzalo JD, Heist BS, Duffy BL, Dyrbye L, Fagan MJ, Ferenchick G, et al. The art of bedside rounds: a multi-center
qualitative study of strategies used by experienced bedside teachers. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(3):412-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2259-2.
8. Yamani N, Delzendeh M, Adibi P, Beigzadeh A. An educational model to teach at the bedside: a qualitative exploratory descriptive study. Res Dev Med Educ. 2023;12(1):25. doi:10.34172/rdme.2023.33143.
9. Cox K. Planning bedside teaching--2. Preparation before entering the wards. Med J Aust. 1993;158(5):355-7. doi:
10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb121800.x.
10. Garout M, Nuqali A, Alhazmi A, Almoallim H. Bedside teaching: the meeting-to-meeting model. Creat Educ.
2016;7(11):1545-50. doi: 10.4236/ce.2016.711159.
11. Branch WT Jr, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002;77(12 Pt
1):1185-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200212000-00005.
12. Paukert JL, Richards ML, Olney C. An encounter card system for increasing feedback to students. Am J Surg. 2002;183(3):300-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00786-9.
13. Wood BP. Feedback: a key feature of medical training. Radiology. 2000;215(1):17-9. doi:10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap5917.
14. Tavakol M, Scammell BE, Wetzel AP. Feedback to support examiners’ understanding of the standard-setting process and the performance of students: AMEE Guide No. 145. Med Teach. 2022;44(6):582-95. doi:10.1080/0142159x.2021.1993164.
15. Heydari S, Beigzadeh A. Medical students’ perspectives of reflection for their professional development. BMC Med Educ.2024;24(1):1399. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06401-2.
)