Document Type : Letter to Editor


1 Cardiovascular Research Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

2 Research Centre for Health Services Management, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences,kerman,Iran

3 Department of English Language, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Kerman Institute of Higher Education, Kerman, Iran


Every journal finds its fundamentals in the course of time by the validity and originality of its published literature. This is validated if authors keep diligence and honesty when they conduct their research and submit their work in a journal. But at times what comes out of a scientific research is not always valid and reliable because there has not been an appropriate control on the work or researchers did not thoroughly conduct and report the results. Thus, it is very important that journals keep an increasingly close eye for the detection of scientific misconduct.


Main Subjects

1. Enserink M. Scientific ethics. Fraud-detection tool could shake up psychology. Science 2012; 337(6090): 21-2.
2. Hein J, Zobrist R, Konrad C, Schuepfer G. Scientific fraud in 20 falsified anesthesia papers: detection using financial auditing methods. Anaesthesist 2012; 61(6): 543-9.
3. Kumar MN. Dealing with misconduct in biomedical research: a review of the problems and the proposed methods for improvement. Account Res 2009; 16(6): 307-30.
4. Miller DR. Publication fraud: implications to the individual and to the specialty. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011; 24(2): 154-9.
5. Schupfer G, Hein J, Casutt M, Steiner L, Konrad C. [From financial to scientific fraud: methods to detect discrepancies in the medical literature]. Anaesthesist 2012; 61(6): 537-42.
6. Wood BD. Academic misconduct and detection. Radiol Technol 2010; 81(3): 276-9.
7. The Committee on Publication Ethics. Available at: Accessed May 1, 2015.
8. Xie Y. What are the consequences of scientific misconduct? Ars Technica.
science/2008/08/what-are-the-consequences-for-scientific-misconduct/. Updated Aug 12, 2008.
9. Redman BK, Merz JF. Scientific Misconduct: Do the Punishments Fit the Crime? Science 2008; 321(5890): 775.