Document Type : Review Article
- Mojtaba Miladinia 1
- Farhad Abolnezhadian 2
- Joachim G. Voss 3
- Kourosh Zarea 1
- Naser Hatamzadeh 4
- Mandana Ghanavati 5
1 Nursing Care Research Center in Chronic Diseases, Nursing & Midwifery School, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Department of Pediatrics, Abuzar Children’s Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
4 Department of Health Education & Promotion, School of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
5 Emergency Medicine Specialist, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Objective: Final patient triage determines which patients can be home-isolated and
which patients require hospitalization on the basis to predict the patient’s prognosis
most accurately. Final triage is an important link in the clinical management chain of the
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and a comprehensive review of various
patient triage methods is very important to guide decision making and triage efficiency.
Decision by clinicians about hospitalization or home-discharge is one of the main challenges
in places with limited hospital facilities compared to the high volume of COVID-19 patients.
This review was designed to guide clinicians on how to address this challenge.
Methods: In this mini review we searched scientific databases to obtain the final triage
methods of COVID-19 patients and the important criteria in each method. In order to
conducted searches a period from December 2019 to July 2020 was considered. All searches
were done in electronic databases and search engines.
Results: Findings revealed four current methods for final triage (decision-making regarding
home-isolation or hospitalization of COVID-19 patients). These methods included 1)
demographic and background information, 2) clinical information, 3) laboratory indicators
and 4) initial chest CT-scan. Each of the aforementioned methods encompassed significant
criteria according to which decisions on the patient’s prognosis and final triage were made.
Finally, by evaluating each final triage method, we found that each method had some
Conclusion: An effective and quick final triage requires simultaneous complementary use
of all four methods to compensate for each other’s weaknesses and add to each other’s
strengths. It is therefore suggested to assure that clinicians are trained in all four COVID-19
patient’s triage methods and their useful criteria in order to achieve evidence-based
performance for better triage (decision between home-isolation versus hospitalization).
2. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. WHO; 2020. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
3. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395(10223): 497-506. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5.
4. Esmaeilpour-Bandboni M, Beig Mohammadi A. Chronic diseases and COVID-19 pandemic. Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care 2020; 9(2): e103463. doi: 10.5812/jjcdc.103463.
5. Haybar H, Kazemnia K, Rahim F. Underlying chronic disease and COVID-19 infection: a state-of-the-art review. Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care 2020; 9(2): e103452. doi:10.5812/jjcdc.103452.
6. Huang L, Han R, Ai T, Yu P, Kang H, Tao Q, et al. Serial quantitative chest CT assessment of COVID-19: deeplearning approach. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020;2(2): e200075. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200075.
7. Sabri A, Davarpanah AH, Mahdavi A, Abrishami A, Khazaei M, Heydari S, et al. Novel coronavirus disease
2019: predicting prognosis with a computed tomographybased disease severity score and clinical laboratory data. Pol Arch Intern Med 2020; 130(7-8): 629-34. doi: 10.20452/pamw.15422.
8. Phua J, Weng L, Ling L, Egi M, Lim CM, Divatia JV, et al. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8(5): 506-17. doi: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30161-2.
9. Ayebare RR, Flick R, Okware S, Bodo B, Lamorde M. Adoption of COVID-19 triage strategies for low-income settings. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8(4): e22. doi: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30114-4.
10. Rahmani S. COVID-19 epidemic: what happens to other routine patients admitted in the emergency department? J Emerg Pract Trauma 2020; 6(2): 53-4. doi: 10.34172/jept.2020.19.
11. Feinstein MM, Niforatos JD, Hyun I, Cunningham TV, Reynolds A, Brodie D, et al. Considerations for ventilator triage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8(6): e53. doi: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30192-2.
12. Hulsbergen AFC, Eijkholt MM, Balak N, Brennum J, Bolger C, Bohrer AM, et al. Ethical triage during the COVID-19 pandemic: a toolkit for neurosurgical resource allocation.Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162(7): 1485-90. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04375-w.
13. Wang Q, Wang X, Lin H. The role of triage in the prevention and control of COVID-19. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020: 1-5. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.185.
14. Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. COVID-19 pandemic: triage for intensive-care treatment under resource scarcity.Swiss Med Wkly 2020; 150: w20229. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20229.
chest CT to predict adverse outcome in COVID-19 pneumonia. Radiology 2020; 296(2): E86-e96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201433.
17. Yang R, Li X, Liu H, Zhen Y, Zhang X, Xiong Q, et al. Chest CT severity score: an imaging tool for assessing severe COVID-19. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020; 2(2):e200047. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200047.
18. Zhang R, Ouyang H, Fu L, Wang S, Han J, Huang K, et al. CT features of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia according to clinical presentation: a retrospective analysis of 120 consecutive patients from Wuhan city. Eur Radiol 2020; 30(8): 4417-26. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06854-1.
19. Tabatabaei SMH, Talari H, Moghaddas F, Rajebi H. Computed tomographic features and short-term prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: a single-center study from Kashan, Iran. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020; 2(2): e200130. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200130.
20. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382(18): 1708-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.
21. Chen HJ, Qiu J, Wu B, Huang T, Gao Y, Wang ZP, et al. Early chest CT features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia: relationship to diagnosis and prognosis. Eur Radiol 2020: 1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06978-4.
22. Soraya GV, Ulhaq ZS. Crucial laboratory parameters in COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis: an updated metaanalysis. Med Clin (Barc) 2020; 155(4): 143-51. doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2020.05.017.
23. Francone M, Iafrate F, Masci GM, et al. Chest CT score in COVID-19 patients: correlation with disease severity and short-term prognosis. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(12):6808-6817.doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07033-y
24. Fu F, Lou J, Xi D, Bai Y, Ma G, Zhao B, et al. Chest computed tomography findings of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Eur Radiol 2020; 30(10):5489-98. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06920-8.
25. Xu X, Yu C, Qu J, Zhang L, Jiang S, Huang D, et al. Imaging and clinical features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47(5): 1275-80. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04735-9.
26. Hu L, Wang C. Radiological role in the detection, diagnosis and monitoring for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020; 24(8): 4523-8. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202004_21035.
27. Liu Y, Mao B, Liang S, Yang JW, Lu HW, Chai YH, et al. Association between age and clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19. Eur Respir J 2020; 55(5). doi:10.1183/13993003.01112-2020.